Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

not perfect

What's happening now is kind of disgusting. Lois' fans call Chloe's fans psychos and we do the same to them in return. But frankly, we are all the same.

Remember when we didn't know if AM will return? Many of us claimed that we have already seen Lois&Clark show. We were angry and very loud about it. Well, now it's turn for team Lois to be angry that AM is back for whole season and they don't know if will ED be there only for 13 episodes or more. It's their turn to claim that they won't watch Chloe&Clark show.

"When we blame ourselves we feel no one else has a right to blame us."
Oskar Wilde

For the big ChloexLois debate, it should be more like: When we complain about Chloe/Lois we feel no one else has the right to complain about them too, because that would be bashing.

Chloe's fan is bashing Lois when she/he is complaining about Lois entry to journalism and DP. Lois' fan is free to complain about it as much as he/she wants. And other way around. Lois' fans can't complain about what Chloe did because we would call it bashing.

Chloe/Lois is useless to the story. Both group of fans are saying it. When fan of Lois writes that Chloe is useless, other fans agree and say it's just opinion and truthful one in it, should they be asked about it by some randomly wandering/stalking fan of Chloe. When they see the same written about Lois, it's bashing. The best part is that I've been in fandom long enough to know that Chloe's fans do exactly the same thing.

Fan of Chloe can write that she isn't acting as Chloe anymore or that he/she wishes AM won't be back for next season. Said fan can write it because it's his/her opinion and a way how to vent frustration over the show. In case it's written by fan of Lois, he/she is called hater and frustrated over EDLois and her nonILL behavior.

Fan of Lois can write that Lois wasn't acting as ILL should and show frustration over her inability to publish her work and get information by herself. It's okay because said fan is just frustrated over Smallville. No one else can say it without being called ED hater and Chloiser.

Many of Chloe fans are getting ridiculed by Lois fans when they claim they will stop watching if AM will leave the show. 
Lois' fans say that we don't really like Smallville and watch just to see Chloe. Well sweethearts, it's true. Do you want to know why?
 Because we have been watching since season 1. We remember when the show had good storylines and characters were actually getting some real development. These times ended with the last episode of season 3. 
See, that's the problem because these fans who makes fun of us, wouldn't know it because they didn't actually see first three seasons. They started watching just when they found out that Lois came to Smallville.
See, we would stop watching if AM left but many Lois' fans started watching when Lois came. What exactly is the difference? Who likes the show more?

Chlark is not going to happen because Clark doesn't love Chloe and is destined to be with Lois. Too bad guys, the universe where Clois is destiny, doesn't have Chloe in it. 
Clois is not going to happen because Clark doesn't love Lois and Lois and Clark didn't even know each other in that stage of life. Too bad guys, welcome to the 'available for all women Clark Kent' verse.

I could keep doing this for another four hours but I don't want to and I hope, you see what I meant by this post.

Frankly, we are doing exactly the same things as other fans do. When we do it, we call it expressing ourselves. When they do it, we call it bashing. 

Can't we just stop that. If you guys can't play nice, stay at your side of sand box. I'm not asking for people to agree with me, I'm asking them for discussing their opinions with me as civilized and educated human should.

So before you go to attack other fans on KSite, LJ or in real life remember these three mottos:

"I used to think anyone doing anything weird was weird. Now I know that it is the people that call others weird that are weird." Paul MacCartney

"The capacity for getting along with our neighbor depends to a large extent on the capacity for getting along with ourselves. The self-respecting individual will try to be as tolerant of his neighbor's shortcomings as he is of his own." Eric Hoffer

"The only way to make sure people you agree with can speak is to support the rights of people you don't agree with." Eleanor Holmes Norton

if it's too much to remember than just think of one short but powerful word:
Tolerance

I will try to remember it too.

Comments

[info]clarksmuse wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:07 pm (UTC)
This is why I stopped posting at ksite. The war-mongering and bashing is just too much for me to handle. :\

Plus? I started out hating Chloe, but she grew on me. And while I like Lois, I like the Lois that we see in Chloe. (Does that make sense?)

So sick and tired of watching people online go after each other over fictional characters!

*pulls out hair* Between the Smallville and Supernatural fandoms, I think they're going to be the end of me.
[info]unstableharpy wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:12 pm (UTC)
Even Supernatural? I always thought it's quite peaceful fandom compared to Smallville and others. Every time I lurked to SPN boards, people were happy with the show and with characters but it was about year ago so I guess things changed since then.
[info]clarksmuse wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 11:25 pm (UTC)
Oh no, the SPN fandom has some serious wackjobs in it, too. And it's only gotten worse in the last year, which is unfortunate. Makes me ashamed to admit I'm a part of that fandom. *sigh*
[info]unstableharpy wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 11:39 pm (UTC)
That's sad :(
Now, I don't know about any peaceful fandom.
[info]clarksmuse wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 11:43 pm (UTC)
This is why I stay away from wank and hide in my little crossover universe. There can't BE any wank because my ship will never, ever sail. Not in a million years. ;)
[info]simplytoopretty wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:17 pm (UTC)
Very good points.

Lately I've been focusing on the fact that Smallville is a fictional TV show and in the long run it really doesn't matter that much. After the whole psycho fan mess I'm content to (hopefully) not get into another mess where fans on each side bash and then get mad when the other side bashes back.

Thinking about tolerance would probably do a lot of us some good. Then fandom could be a happy place.
[info]unstableharpy wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:29 pm (UTC)
I know. It's strange that people are getting so worked up over a show. I guess many of us just use it as a easy way how to get the frustration out of our system and the frustration doesn't have to be necessearily tied to Smallville.

It's interesting that these bashing battles are usually because female characters. On Smallville is always about LoisxLanaxChloe. For Harry Potter it's about HermionexGinnyxLuna. The same goes for Gilmore Girls etc.
Really, why it's never been about PetexClarkxLex?
[info]iliana_1 wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:26 pm (UTC)
Whilst I think a peaceful fandom would be quite relaxing to have, I just don't think it's possible with Smallville and I've given up trying.

I don't personally have anything against anybody in this fandom apart from one crazy nut but I think some biases are too strong to overcome and there's too many people interested in saying their piece to keep the peace.

[info]unstableharpy wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:33 pm (UTC)
I don't think Smallville fandom will be ever peaceful but I hope it could be without people calling each others psychos etc. I mean many of people in fandom are over twenty, shouldn't they be acting more like adults and keep their cool.
[info]mssullivan wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:32 pm (UTC)
I'll politely disagree. I don't go out of my way to harass closiers they way they do with us. That is psycho. I haven't seen ONE chloiser/chlarker visit a cloiser journal and harass them for liking the pairing.

When you start getting random PMs about how much of a hateful person you are because you don't like lois, get anonymous comments on your icons/fics/vids because they are chlarky or bad mouth you on someone else's journal you are allowed to feel stalked, harassed for a fictional character/actress.

I don't like edLois and I could care less for Erica Durance, but for some reason ppl feel the need to harass me because I don't care for either.

I wasn't a negative person. All my icons were pro-chloe/chlois and when someone said those were anti-clois icons...I gave them something to talk about and started making anti icons.

Tolerance is something earned, they have not earned it.
[info]ellyfanfiction wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:38 pm (UTC)
Thank you, MsS. I concur. Ever since AM got resigned, they've been coming after us. I've had two or three unpleasant comments on my blog criticizing me for daring to write stories featuring Chloe as a reporter, and chastising me for my treatment of EDLois. A few posts are no big deal, but why does anyone feel the need to go to journals they KNOW they will not agree with and leave ugly comments berating the writer for writing a ship they don't like?

And then we have KSite. EDLois fans are FLOODING KSite with nasty, unpleasant, close-to-abusive posts. One anti-Chloiser posted over fifty posts to the KSite Chlois debate thread in the space of forty-eight hours. ANY pro-Chlois comment there is met with several aggressively unpleasant posts. They are deliberately shouting down Chloe fans on that thread.

I don't hang around the rest of KSite much, but I gather it's much the same-- say anything positive about Chloe, and a whole bunch of posters will jump on you. KSite used to be an okay place to hang out, but now it's a genuinely hostile environment.

Like MsS, I'm just not feeling an inclination to be tolerant toward people who behave like that.

Edited at 2008-05-30 10:39 pm (UTC)
[info]clarksmuse wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 11:30 pm (UTC)
One anti-Chloiser posted over fifty posts to the KSite Chlois debate thread in the space of forty-eight hours. ANY pro-Chlois comment there is met with several aggressively unpleasant posts.

That's nine kinds of wrong. What is WRONG with people? Where do they get off flaunting that in other peoples' faces? Whatever happened to the idea that it's okay to agree to disagree with people?

KSite used to be an okay place to hang out, but now it's a genuinely hostile environment.

And no one's doing anything to stop them, which is why I stopped posting there a good year ago. Sad to see it's gotten worse. :(
[info]unstableharpy wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:46 pm (UTC)
I know what you mean. It's your right to make anti-Lois or anti-Clois icons or posts. If it's your way how to express your opinion then people should respect it and they definitely have no right to harass you.
I have seen anti-Chlois and anti-Chloe icons around. I didn't start harassing these people and I don't think you would harass them either. That's tolerance.
I think PMs and anonymous comments are way too extreeme. When I wrote this and I didn't think about people like that but about more stable and open for discussion people.
[info]iliana_1 wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:54 pm (UTC)
When I wrote this and I didn't think about people like that but about more stable and open for discussion people.

I know :)

And I would completely agree with you if quite a few of my friends hadn't been harassed by email, PM, nasty comments on blogs/LJ, etc.

It's really been quite awful over the last few weeks, much worse then I would have ever expected.
[info]unstableharpy wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:57 pm (UTC)
What you, MsS and Elly are speaking about is harassing. I don't think that should be tolerated.
[info]unstableharpy wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:55 pm (UTC)
One more thing: I personally don't think that tolerance should be earned. It should be natural. Respect is to be earned but not tolerance.
I don't mean that if someone came to you and stab you in the eye you shouldn't take action against the person but if it's just different opinion, it really doesn't matter.
[info]mssullivan wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 10:56 pm (UTC)
I see tolerance as a level of respect. I will NOT tolerate their harassment of my friends. If you (general you) do any of the above actions, I reserve the right to call you (again, general you) a psycho. There is no room for tolerance with behavior like that.
[info]unstableharpy wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 11:02 pm (UTC)
As I wrote above, I agree with you in this. What you're describing is harassment and it should not be tolerated.
Frankly, I didn't even thought about it while writing my post because harassment is not your standard behavior and society should not tolerate it or turn a blind eye on it.
[info]xtremeroswellia wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 11:22 pm (UTC)
I think I get what you're saying.

Like, hello? This is fandom? You know, fun stuff about a fictional TV show. I'll be the first to say I love Chloe and I hope they do the Chlois theory.

I'll also step up and say the world won't end if they don't. Yeah, I would've stopped watching if AM had been axed for next season. That's my personal decision, no one else's. Everyone's entitled to their opinions. It'd be nice if all of us could just enjoy the aspect of the shows we like and not take it personally if someone has a different opinion than we do.

But some people DO take it to an extreme and openly attack people for having differing opinions--I've seen this for every fandom I've ever been part of. And frankly I used to get really upset over it. Now I just don't really care unless someone's attacking a friend of mine.

I think fandom, as a whole, could do a hell of a lot of good if/when we put our minds to it--and actually do things to make the world better. Frankly right now that's what I'm trying to focus on. I love fandom. It's my escape. But I'm not devoting nearly as much attention to it as I used to. *shrugs*

/hope that made sense, lol...
[info]unstableharpy wrote:
May. 30th, 2008 11:36 pm (UTC)
It makes sense.
It just bothers me that you can't discuss things. Even these people who aren't crazy stalkers aren't open for good old-fashioned debate about Smallville. Lately, fans got, lets say, paranoid and look for bashing in every little thing you write.
As I said previously, I don't take stalkers and other extremities into account when thinking about people. I'm trained from school. My brain works only with stable people. I study pol sci and not psychology.
I love your icon. So cute.
[info]margroks wrote:
Jun. 1st, 2008 01:19 am (UTC)
Lately, K-Site has been a horror with the same small number of people being as nasty as they want, being outright insulting, clearly violating the TOS repeatedly and while they have had their comments edited, I doubt that alone will ever make them behave politely. They are a bunch of supercilious jerks who mock you, insult you, impune your judgement ("if you were REALLY paying attention,") or call you a liar ("If you had REALLY been reading comics as you claim,") if you have an opinion or canon evidence that contradicts what they are saying. I still can't understand why a few of those people weren't banned a long time ago.

The Chlois theory does pit the two characters against each other and I just don't see that there is going to ever be a point on which these two groups of people are likely to agree; furthermore, the writers have encouraged the Chlois theory at times, by their own admission; they contrast the two girls deliberately and I resent being told by "Lois" fans that I am imagining it all or making it up, etc.

Of course few people descend to the level of whacko that MLV has but there is still plenty of nastiness coming from that side of the fence. It appears to me that a majority of Anti-Chloisers or ED fans on K-Site go out of their way to intentionally insult us and I'm just not going to see eye to eye with that kind of behavior. They swarm on any Chloe or Chlois fan like a pack of sharks, posting repeatedly, one after the other, egging each other on to be be even more rude. If I post one comment on the Chlois thread, I can just sit and count up the email repsonses that pop up almost immediately, and it is always the same people saying how stupid we are for thinking/saying whatever it was. Unfortunately, I don't think there can be the kind of tolerance you're hoping for when one group tends to behave like that.
[info]unstableharpy wrote:
Jun. 1st, 2008 12:05 pm (UTC)
I know KSite got much worse these days. Both sides have these supercilious jerks who mock you. Sadly. I've been around KSite long enough to know that some people can't behave as adults when debating. I wish people were just above these things. I mean it's just stupid tv show. Not even good one.
About MLV no comment. Even Cloisers are ashamed that she belongs to them.
I'd write more but it's way too hot to think.
Btw, I love your icon. Is it your cat?
[info]margroks wrote:
Jun. 2nd, 2008 11:43 am (UTC)
Yep, that's Pyewacket, named after the witch's familiar in Bell, Book and Candle. She's the smartest cat I've ever owned; too smart for her, and our, own good. She is so very communicative and she seems to understand all too much.

I have two others, brothers, we think, because they each have an extra whisker and they both have corns on their foot pads, something I have never seen on cats before. Pye doesn't like her brothers and is definitely the top cat of our house!

Profile

women
[info]unstableharpy
unstableharpy

Latest Month

September 2008
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930